Cogbird is now in private beta.

SEO on autopilot

Cogbird watches your site, finds improvements worth making, and makes them — your search traffic keeps growing autonomously.

3-day trial
Runs autonomously
MCP native

Most of what a site audit finds is not worth your morning.

Cogbird throws the rest away, and does what is left.

Mode:Agentic

There is a pull request for you to review

Who deals with it, and actions
Internal authority is misaligned with demand in docsHigh
Google is rewriting the title on 14 pagesMedium
/integrations/slack answers none of the 6 questions Google prints above itMedium
backlinko.com covers technical seo checklist in depth and /guides/seo does notMedium
9 pages in blog draw impressions no page links toLow
When it movesIts place, who deals with it, and actions
Internal authority is misaligned with demand in docs25 Sep
Where it has got to
/pricing is outranked on 3 queries it targets by ahrefs.com and semrush.comIn review23 Sep
Titles were being rewritten on 22 compare pagesMerged18 Sep
/pricing had no description Google would useImproved21 Aug
4 docs pages were starved of internal linksNo change3 Aug
/blog/seo-audit was outranked by ahrefs.com on its own titleConfounded15 Jul

Your autonomous SEO agent

Everything you’d do yourself, if you ever had the time.

Connect in one click

Read-only access to Search Console. Nothing is ever written back through it.

Useful the first night

The first pass takes your whole history and crawls your site overnight.

Where your site leaks

Declared, crawled, indexed, earning — and which step loses you the most.

What a rewrite would cost

What a page already earns, and which heading is the only thing claiming it.

Pages you do not have

Keywords your competitors hold a page for — and it writes yours.

Who links to your rivals

Domains linking to every competitor and not to you, with the page to pitch.

Every change measured

Differenced against a frozen set of your own pages that nobody touched.

Counted only when read

The window does not start until Google has actually re-crawled the page.

Pull requests, optional

They wait for you, or merge on your own checks. Closing one is the rollback.

I was tired of wasting time on manual SEO work, so I built Cogbird to put my site improvements on autopilot — and to tell me which ones actually worked.

Kevin Larsson

Founder, Cogbird

$99 a site. That’s it.

One plan, no tiers, no add-ons. Everything the engine does is in it.

$99/mo
3-day trial, from your first connected site.
Card required. Nothing charged until it ends.
Or $990 a year — two months free.
Request access

Every detector, every night

Search Console and Bing data.

Search data included

Rank, volume and backlinks.

Every change measured

Against your own untouched pages.

The full MCP surface

Every tool, from day one.

Unlimited seats

Billed per site, never per seat.

Leave with your data

Thirty days read-only after you cancel.

No free tier. Every scan crawls your site from our address and buys real search data, and that is a real cost.

SEO that runs itself.

Start your 3-day trial.

Request access

The questions a buyer actually asks.

Answered with the mechanism, not with a reassurance.

They are good, and reading Search Console is not what you would be paying for. The throwing away is — most of what a site audit finds is noise — and so is the verdict that comes back after you ship one.

You do not yet, and neither does the engine on your site. That is what the verdict is for: every change you ship is measured against a frozen cohort of your own untouched pages, and the answer comes back whether it flattered us or not.

Only if you ask it to. The Google grant is read-only and nothing is ever written back through it. Connect a repository and switch on pull requests and it will open them for what it finds — and every one waits for you. A second setting, off unless you turn it on separately, lets them merge on your own checks instead, so a repository that reports no passing check merges nothing at all. The first change of every kind still meets a person, so does a sample of the rest, and closing the pull request is the whole of the rollback.

Not unless you switch that on, and it is a separate setting from pull requests rather than part of them — fixing a heading and putting a URL on your site that did not exist before are different decisions, and only the second one changes what Google can index. When it is on, a new page arrives the same way every other change does: as a pull request you read. It is written against your own collection — the directory, the frontmatter fields and the voice are all learned from the posts already there, not from a form you filled in.

Where your site leaks pages, what each page already earns before your agent touches it, pages your competitors rank for that you do not have, and the domains linking to them and not to you. None of it waits on a measurement.

Nothing can, and anyone who says otherwise is selling you something — Google re-crawls on its own schedule and its Indexing API covers job postings and livestreams. What it does do is submit to the engines that accept being told, and tell you plainly when Google has not been back to look.

Below a certain number of comparable pages there is no fair comparison group, and it will say so rather than guess. Proposals are exempt — a page that does not exist needs no comparison group.

Write to your site unless you asked. Cite a number the evidence does not contain. Claim confidence in something it has never measured on your site. Or report a finding it could not measure as though it had.